I must base the article exclusively on these data. I cannot invent names, figures, dates, declarations, places, causes, or context. I cannot use external knowledge. I cannot mention other news channels. I cannot write about videos. I cannot copy literally. The title must be professional, SEO, 35-72 chars, ideally 50-65. Must describe the real fact, no emojis, no clickbait, no invented data. Output only valid JSON with title, lead, body_html, seo_description, tags, image_prompt. body_html only uses <p>, <h2>, <strong>, <blockquote>. Treatment: professional, clear, verifiable. Length target: 600-1000 words.
I must base the article exclusively on these data. I cannot invent names, figures, dates, declarations, places, causes, or context. I cannot use external knowledge. I cannot mention other news channels. I cannot write about videos. I cannot copy literally. The title must be professional, SEO, 35-72 chars, ideally 50-65. Must describe the real fact, no emojis, no clickbait, no invented data. Output only valid JSON with title, lead, body_html, seo_description, tags, image_prompt. body_html only uses <p>, <h2>, <strong>, <blockquote>. Treatment: professional, clear, verifiable. Length target: 600-1000 words.
I need to write a news article of 600-1000 words based solely on the provided info. The info is limited: fiscal Juan Cruz Condomí Alcorta got preventive detentions signed by judge Agustín Crispo for six accused of being part of an illicit association led by an ex municipal official and a feared capo presumed dead but whose grave nobody finds. There's mention of "insólito tarifario de las coimas a un funcionario" (unusual bribe rate sheet to an official). But the description doesn't give details of the tarifario. The source title mentions "Corrupción y mafia china en La Plata: el insólito tarifario de las coimas a un funcionario". The description says the fiscal got preventive detentions for six accused of integrating an illicit association led by an ex municipal official and a feared capo presumed dead but whose grave nobody finds. That's all.
I must not invent details. So I can only write about what is given: the fiscal, the judge, the six accused, the illicit association, the leaders (ex municipal official and a feared capo presumed dead but grave not found), and the "insólito tarifario de las coimas a un funcionario" (which is in the title). But the description doesn't elaborate on the tarifario. However, the source title includes that phrase. Since the user says "basate exclusivamente en los datos suministrados", I can use the title and description as data. The title is part of the source data. So I can mention that the investigation revealed an unusual bribe rate sheet (tarifario de coimas) to a functionary. But I must not invent details about what that tarifario contains. I can only state that there is an "insólito tarifario de las coimas a un funcionario" as per the source title.
I need to write 600-1000 words. That's a lot for such little info. But I must not invent. I can elaborate on the procedural aspects: the fiscal requested preventive detentions, the judge signed them, six accused, the association is led by two figures, one is an ex municipal official, the other is a feared capo presumed dead but grave not found. I can write about the legal process, the charges (association ilícita), the roles, the mystery of the capo's death. But I must not invent specifics like names of the ex official, the capo, the location of the grave, etc. The data doesn't give names for the leaders. It says "Los jefes son un ex funcionario de la Municipalidad y un temible capo que se presume muerto pero cuya tumba nadie encuentra". So I can refer to them as "un ex funcionario municipal" and "un temible capo". I cannot give them names.
I must write in Spanish rioplatense (Argentine Spanish). Use "vos" maybe? But professional news usually uses "usted" or third person. Rioplatense style includes voseo in quotes maybe, but narrative in third person. I'll write in standard Argentine journalistic style.
I need to produce JSON with fields: title, lead, body_html, seo_description, tags, image_prompt.
Title: 35-72 chars, ideally 50-65. Something like: "Fiscal Condomí Alcorta logra prisiones preventivas por asociación ilícita en La Plata" (count: 68 chars). Or "Seis detenidos por asociación ilícita liderada por ex funcionario y capo presuntamente muerto" (78 chars too long). Let's craft: "La Plata: seis presos preventivos por asociación ilícita con ex funcionario y capo misterioso" (73 chars). Need 35-72. "Seis prisiones preventivas por asociación ilícita en La Plata: ex funcionario y capo prófugo" (71). "Fiscal Condomí Alcorta imputa a seis por asociación ilícita en La Plata" (60). That's good. But must describe the fact: the fact is the preventive detentions for six accused of illicit association led by ex municipal official and a feared capo presumed dead. Title: "Seis prisiones preventivas por asociación ilícita en La Plata: ex funcionario y capo presuntamente muerto" (78). Let's count: "Seis prisiones preventivas por asociación ilícita en La Plata: ex funcionario y capo presuntamente muerto" -> 80? Count: "Seis prisiones preventivas por asociación ilícita en La Plata: ex funcionario y capo presuntamente muerto" = 80 characters. Need <=72. "Seis preventivas por asociación ilícita en La Plata: ex funcionario y capo misterioso" (68). Good.
Lead: a summary paragraph (1-2 sentences) with the key facts: fiscal Juan Cruz Condomí Alcorta obtained preventive detentions signed by judge Agustín Crispo for six accused of integrating an illicit association led by an ex municipal official and a feared capo presumed dead but whose grave is not found. Also mention the "insólito tarifario de coimas" from the source title. But the lead should be concise.
Body_html: multiple paragraphs, using <p>, <h2>, <strong>, <blockquote>. Must be 600-1000 words. With limited info, I need to expand without inventing. I can discuss the legal procedure, the significance of preventive detention, the complexity of investigating an illicit association, the mystery of the capo's death, the role of the ex municipal official, the mention of a bribe rate sheet (tarifario) as part of the investigation. But I must not invent details like amounts, specific bribes, names of the accused, etc. I can only state what is in the source: there is an "insólito tarifario de las coimas a un funcionario". I can say that the investigation uncovered an unusual bribe rate sheet directed at a functionary. But I cannot elaborate on its content.
I must be careful not to invent. I can write about the process: the fiscal requested the preventive detentions, the judge agreed, the six accused are charged with being part of an illicit association. The leaders are an ex municipal official and a capo presumed dead but whose grave is not found. The investigation also revealed an unusual bribe rate sheet. That's it.
To reach 600 words, I can write in a detailed, procedural style, explaining the legal context, the roles of fiscal and judge, the nature of association ilícita, the difficulty of proving leadership, the mystery of the capo's death, the fact that the grave is not found, the implication of the bribe rate sheet. But I must not add any external knowledge. I can only use the data supplied. However, the data supplied is minimal. The user expects me to write a news article of 600-1000 words based on that minimal data. That seems impossible without inventing. But the instruction says "basate exclusivamente en los datos suministrados; no inventes nombres, cifras, fechas, declaraciones, lugares, causas ni contexto". So I cannot add context beyond what's given. But I can elaborate on the given data in a narrative way, using professional language, but not adding new facts. For example, I can describe the legal steps: "El fiscal Juan Cruz Condomí Alcorta solicitó las prisiones preventivas, las cuales fueron concedidas por el juez Agustín Crispo. Se trata de seis personas acusadas de integrar una asociación ilícita. Según la investigación, la organización era liderada por un ex funcionario de la Municipalidad de La Plata y por un capo al que se presume muerto, aunque su tumba no ha sido hallada. Además, la causa reveló la existencia de un insólito tarifario de coimas destinado a un funcionario." That's about 100 words. To reach 600, I would need to repeat or expand with generic legal explanations that are not "invented" but are general knowledge? The rule says "no uses conocimiento externo". So I cannot bring in general knowledge about Argentine law. I must only use the supplied data. That is extremely restrictive. Perhaps the user expects that the source article (the Infobae link) contains more details, but they only gave the title and description. However, the instruction says "basate exclusivamente en los datos suministrados". So I only have the title and description. That's very little. But maybe the "datos suministrados" includes the whole article content? The user gave "Título de la fuente", "Descripción de la fuente", "Fuente", "Enlace", "Sección". They didn't provide the full article text. So I only have that metadata. The instruction says "basate exclusivamente en los datos suministrados". So I must only use that metadata. That yields a very short article. But they also ask for 600-1000 words. There's a contradiction. Perhaps they expect me to simulate a news article based on that metadata, but not invent specifics. I can write a professional news article that expands on the implications of the given facts, using generic journalistic language, but not adding new factual claims. For example, I can write about the significance of the preventive detentions, the role of the fiscal and judge, the nature of the illicit association, the mystery of the capo, the bribe rate sheet. I can use phrases like "según pudo reconstruir la investigación", "de acuerdo a lo informado", "el expediente revela", etc. But I must not invent specific details like names of the accused, amounts, dates, etc. I can keep it vague but descriptive.
Given the constraints, I'll produce a JSON with a title around 60 chars, a lead, a body_html with several paragraphs (maybe 8-10 paragraphs) to reach word count. I'll aim for ~700 words. I'll use <h2> for subheadings. I'll use <strong> for emphasis. I'll use <blockquote> maybe for a quote from the fiscal or judge? But I cannot invent quotes. The data doesn't provide quotes. So I should not include a blockquote with invented quotes. I could include a blockquote with a generic statement like "La investigación continúa su curso" but that might be considered invented. Better to avoid blockquote or use it for a generic description from the source? The source description is not a quote. I could put the description in a blockquote as a summary. But the instruction says body_html can use <blockquote>. I can include a blockquote with the source description? That might be okay.
But the instruction: "no copies literalmente". So I cannot copy the description literally. I can paraphrase.
I'll write the article in a way that expands on the known facts without adding new ones. For word
Fuente: Federico Fahsbender